School Counselling and Sandplay
Korean Association of School Sandplay
Research Article

The Efficacy of School Sandplay Group Counselling on the Attachment of Elementary School Students with Early Self-injury Behavior: A Preliminary Study

박에스더1, 안운경2,
Ester Park1, Un-Kyoung Ahn2,
1단국대학교 상담심리학과
2단국대학교 상담심리학과
1Dankook University
2Dankook University
Corresponding author : Un-Kyoung Ahn, (31116) PhD, Department of Counseling Psychology, The Graduate School of Policy and Business Administration, Dankook University, 119 Dandae-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan, Chungnam, Republic of Korea, E-mail : ahnunkyoung@dankook.ac.kr

© 2024 Korean Association of School Sandplay. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-ShareAlike License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 13, 2024; Revised: May 19, 2024; Revised: Jul 02, 2024; Accepted: Jul 21, 2024

Published Online: Aug 31, 2024

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of school sandplay group counselling on self-injury behavior and attachment to elementary school students showing early self-harm behavior. The study consisted of 22 students in the sixth grade of elementary school located in a small and medium-sized city with a population of 870,000, and group counselling for school sandplay was conducted once a week for a total of 8 times, 40 minutes. In order to verify the effectiveness of group counselling for school sandplay, self-harm function evaluation (FASM) and attachment (ECR-R) were conducted before and after, and significant changes were observed in self-harm behavior (t=-3.823, P=.001) and unstable attachment (t=-3.078, P=.006).

요약

본 연구는 초기 자해행동을 보이는 초등학생들에게 학교모래놀이 집단상담을 실시하여 자해행동과 애착에 미치는 효과에 대해 알아보고자 하였다. 연구 대상으로는 인구 87만의 중소도시에 소재한 초등학교 6학년 22명의 학생들로 구성되었으며 학교모래놀이 집단상담은 주 1회, 40분씩 총 8회로 실시하였다. 학교모래놀이 집단상담의 효과를 검증하기 위하여 자해기능평가(FASM)과 애착(ECR-R)을 사전과 사후에 실시하였으며, 자해행동(t=-3.823, P=.001)과 불안정 애착(t=-3.078, P=.006)에서 유의한 변화가 관찰되었다.

Keywords: Elementary school students; self-injury; attachment; school sandplay group counselling
Keywords: 초등학생; 자해 행동; 애착; 학교모래놀이 집단상담

Attachment, proposed by Bowlby (1969), is a strong emotional bond that infants feel during interactions with their parents. Mother-child relationship interactions early in life are important for individual development. Infants form secure attachments through sensitive and appropriate responses from their parents and explore the world using their parents as a safe base (Ainsworth, 1989). Attachment is related to many developmental functions during an infant’s growth process, such as social relationships, emotion regulation, and curiosity (Sroufe, 2005). Attachment affects a child’s self-concept and view of the social world (Collins & Read, 1990), and continues to influence relationships with others throughout an individual’s life and even after becoming an adult. (Ainsworth, 1989; Kobak & Sceery, 1988).

The pattern of attachment effects appears similar across age, gender, and racial groups, and adolescents with a secure attachment report overall superior functioning across multiple developmental domains compared to those in the insecure attachment group (Cooper, Shaver, & Collins, 1998). Secure attachment affects adolescents’ ego resilience (Kobak & Sceery, 1988). Children who have formed insecure attachment relationships with their parents react with anger, claiming that they have been rejected, that others dislike them, and that they will act aggressively (Lee, Seo, & Jin, 2000). Insecure attachment affects not only adolescents’ externalizing behavior problems such as aggression and delinquency, but also their internalizing behaviors such as depression, anxiety, and immature behavior (Park & Lee, 2008). Children with an insecure attachment have higher levels of anxiety and depression than those with a secure attachment (Muris, Mayer, & Meesters, 2000).

The beginning of self-injury is related to attachment anxiety (Tatnell, Kelada, Hasking, & Martin, 2014). Self-injury is related to unstable relationships with primary caregivers, including physical and sexual abuse and emotional neglect (Kim, 2020). Trust and communication with mothers are associated with self-injury (Gandhi et al., 2016; Claes, De Raedt, Van de Walle, & Bosmans, 2016). Research on domestic adolescents also reports that maternal attachment has a direct effect on self-injury behavior (Hong & Park, 2022).

Family environmental factors such as attachment type and parenting influence the development of anger/hostility in adolescents (Muris, Mayer, & Meesters, 2004), and adolescents with high levels of anger and anxiety have a high frequency of self-harm (Kwon, 2014) and social Loneliness due to isolation can cause or worsen self-injury (Guertin, Lloyd-Richardson, Spirito, Donaldson, & Boergers, 2001; Kim et al., 2022). Additionally, impulsivity is a major factor in self-injury (Herpertz, Sass, & Favazza, 1997; Kim, 2019).

In general, the function of self-injury is to escape emotional states such as anxiety, sadness, and anger, or to escape negative cognitive states such as bad thoughts and bad memories (Nock, Prinstein, & Sterba, 2009). Self-injury is a means of avoiding unwanted emotional experiences (Chapman, Gratz, & Brown, 2006), and is often done to regulate emotions (Kwon, 2014). It also has a social communication function to gain the attention of people around you or avoid your obligations or responsibilities (Nock & Prinstein, 2004). It is also related to the purpose of self-punishment due to negative self-worth (Hooley & Germain, 2014). A study of 188 domestic adults reported that the more people seek stimulation when alone or with someone else, or injury themselves for the purpose of self-punishment, the more likely they are to belong to the self-injury maintenance group (Kim et al., 2020). In a study of 153 self-harming students in 4th to 6th grade of elementary school in Korea to determine the function of self-injury, the most common reason children self-injury was ‘because they were annoyed’ at 62.24%, followed by ‘to soothe their anxious minds’ at 48.98%. 41.84% said ‘to escape from a bad mood’, 38.78% ‘because I was bored’, and 32.65% ‘trying to express my difficult feelings through my body’ (Jeong et al., 2023).

The proportion of adolescents who experienced self-injury behavior was 48.57% in a study of 315 4th to 6th grade elementary school students in a domestic community (Jeong et al., 2023), and 50.7% in a study of 150 students in 5th to 6th grade. (Shin & Kim, 2021), 7.0% (Lee et al., 2023) was investigated in a study targeting 229 first-year middle school students.

Self-injury increases the risk of suicidal behavior (Klonsky, & Olino, 2008; Anestis, Pennings, Lavender, Tull, & Gratz, 2013; Guan, Fox, & Prinstein, 2012). In a survey using semi-structured interviews with 8,000 adolescents in the United States, considering that 70% of adolescents who engage in non-suicidal self-injury behavior have actually attempted suicide (Nock & Kessler, 2006), and it’s a serious problem.

Adolescents are influenced by their peers’ self-harming behavior (Nock & Prinstein, 2005). Adolescence is a key period in the process of transferring attachment objects from one primary caregiver to another (Hazan & Shaver, 1994). Attachment to parents increases adolescents’ ego resilience and stable peer relationships, thereby reducing anxiety and avoidance in peer relationships (Kim & Kwon, 2014). When secure attachments are formed with peers, behavioral contagion among adolescents appears to be low, whereas groups that have formed insecure attachments are vulnerable to behavioral contagion such as self-injury (Lee JH, Choi SM, & Yoo IH, 2021; Lee, Choi, & Yoo, 2021). Additionally, a study on domestic adults reported that loneliness, exposure to interpersonal relationships, and exposure to media all affect the severity of non-suicidal self-injury (Kim et al., 2022). This is why we need to pay attention to the self-injury behavior of elementary school students in the insecure attachment group.

Supportive relationships between adolescents and their mothers can promote a better sense of self by leading to identity integration and reduced confusion, and can reduce vulnerability to self-injury behavior (Gandhi et al., 2016). The more children build trust with their parents, communicate smoothly, and receive appropriate attention from their parents, the higher the child’s ability to control their anger (Lee, 2017). A longitudinal study of 1,973 students aged 12 to 18 recruited from 40 Australian high schools reported that greater family support was associated with decreased self-injury behavior (Tatnell, Kelada, Hasking & Martin, 2014). In a study targeting third-year middle school students in Korea, results showed that a high level of parental support can reduce the influence of impulsivity on self-injury behavior (Kim, 2019). In a study targeting 5th and 6th grade elementary school students in Korea, it showed that family support is a protective factor that reduces self-injury behavior in upper grade elementary school students (Shin & Kim, 2021).

Therefore, when counselling adolescents, counselling intervention should take into account not only the level of problem behavior but also the unstable attachment that is expected to have influenced the manifestation of the behavior (Park & Lee, 2008). Sandplay therapy allows the client to demonstrate self-healing power through a relationship between the counselor and client that completely trusts and loves each other like a mother and child. Clients safely express their suppressed inner emotions in a free and protected space (Kalff, 2003). Counselors listen actively and non-judgmentally to clients and promote secure attachment (Green, Myrick, & Crenshaw, 2013). In this way, sandplay therapy is effective for a wide range of psychological problems and disorders, including psychological trauma, beyond verbal communication and cognitive insight (Roesler, 2019; Freedle, 2007; Miyuki, 2017).

Sandplay therapy is a useful tool with clinical evidence for school counselors in school settings (Carmichael, 1994; Allan & Berry, 1987; Goss & Campbell, 2004; Banwarth, S. I. 2007).

School sandplay group counselling is effective in reducing negative emotions and problem behavior in elementary school students (Kwak et al., 2018; Jeon, Lee, & Kwak, 2022; Lee & Kim, 2020). In a study of 70 high school students in the Adolescent Personality and Mental Health Problems Screening Questionnaire (AMPQ) risk group, it was reported that school sandplay group counselling reduced depression and aggression and had an effect on positive attachment (Ahn, 2021). Another study targeting 68 high school students in the AMPQ risk group reported that it is an effective treatment method for improving not only internalized problems such as depression, anxiety, and self-esteem, but also externalized problems such as attention deficit, hyperactivity, and impulsivity(Lee, 2024). In addition, there is a study that shows that school sandplay group counselling has a significant clinical effect on the sensory processing function and suicidal thoughts of elementary school students with suicidal thoughts (Kim, Kim, & Ahn, 2024).

Based on these previous studies, This study aims to confirm changes in the target group after conducting school sandplay group counselling for anxiously attached elementary school students who reported self-injury behavior.

The hypothesis of this study was set as follows.

<Hypothesis 1> School sandplay group counselling will reduce self-injury behavior in elementary school students.

<Hypothesis 2> School Sandplay group counselling will reduce anxious attachment in elementary school students with self-harm behavior.

Methods

Research Subjects and procedures

The research team sent an official notice regarding the purpose of this study to school counselors at elementary schools in the community, and held a preliminary meeting with school counselors from schools that agreed to the purpose of the study. The elementary school is located in a small city with a population of 870,000. It is a dense residential area surrounded by apartment complexes with many single-parent families and multi-cultural families, and was receiving support from the Office of Education as a special school in emotional crisis.

After selecting 6th grade as the target grade at a pre-meeting, prior consultation was held with the teachers’ meeting and parents’ association of that grade, and an official letter regarding the pre-screening of students’ self-injury behavior was sent to all parents of 6th grade students, and 161 students agreed to the self-harm behavior survey. A pre-test was administered to students.

Individual interviews were conducted with 26 students who responded to one or more self-harm behavior items in the survey, the survey results were delivered to parents, and measures for the mental health and safety of the students were guided. 23 students who agreed to the research purpose participated in the study. Additionally, one student who did not take the post-test due to frequent absences was excluded from the statistical analysis. The flow of the research process is as shown in <Figure 1>, and the demographic characteristics of the participants in the study are as shown in <Table 1>.

scs-6-2-18-g1
Figure 1. Flow diagram for study participation
Download Original Figure
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participants.
Mean ± SD Range Frequency(%)
Sex Male 10(45.5%)
Female 12(54.5%)
Age 11.8±0.3 11.3-12.2
Height(cm) 153.4±7.4 139-167
Weight (kg) 46.2±11.2 30-73
BMI 19.5±4.1 13.4-31.6
Economic Level High 5(22.7%)
Middle 14(63.6%)
Low 2(9.1%)
Download Excel Table
Treatment Method

This study is a field-based study to actively respond through prevention and treatment to the recently increasing risk of suicide and self-injury behavior in clinical settings such as schools. Therefore, considering the characteristics of the research environment and ethical issues, such as a school clinical site, One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design without a control group was adopted.

School sandplay group counselling was conducted once a week for a total of 8 sessions between April and July 20XX. Each session lasted 40 minutes, and in the introduction stage, a 5-minute meditation session was held, along with promises of information protection such as ‘keeping each other’s secrets’ and creating a safe group counselling atmosphere. Each participant was free to create their own sand work for 15 to 25 minutes, and a sharing time was held for the remaining 10 to 20 minutes to enjoy the work they created together. Four participating students and one sandplay counselor formed a group, and six groups conducted group counselling simultaneously in one classroom. The overall program also applied the principles of school sandplay group counselling by Kwak, Ahn, and Lim (2020) in the case of school sandplay. In the method of creating and appreciating works of sandplay group therapy by Ahn, Kwak, and Kim (2021), a method was adopted in which one client works in one sandbox and appreciates each other’s works in order.

The treatment method is as shown in <Figure 2>.

scs-6-2-18-g2
Figure 2. Treatment Method (Figure2 Source: Ahn, Kwak, Kim. Review: Research Trends in Korean Journal of Sandplay Group Therapy. Sch. Couns. Sandplay 2021;3(2):66-84. https://doi.org/10.54084/SCS.2021.3.2.66)
Download Original Figure
Measurement Tool

Self-injury Behavior (The Functional Assessment of Self-Mutilation; FASM).

The ‘Korean version of the self-harm function evaluation sheet’ was used developed by Lloyd et al. (1997) and adapted by Kwon and Kwon (2017). It is a 7-point Likert scale with 39 questions, and the higher the score, the higher the frequency of self-harm behavior for that item. This scale consists of self-harm methods, frequency and social and personal motivations. Cronbach’s α in this study was .80.

Attachment (Experiences in close Relationship-revised; ECR-R).

ECR-RJ developed by Bernman et al. (1998) and adapted by Kim (2004) for adolescents, and modified for teenagers by Park (2008) was used. There are a total of 36 questions, and each question is rated on a 7-point Likert scale from ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree.’ A higher score indicates anxious or avoidant attachment characteristics, and Cronbach’s α in this study was .80.

Data Analysis

For the data collected in this study, SPSS 25.0 program was used to calculate descriptive statistics and Cronbach’s α value for reliability analysis of each scale, and paired-sample t-test was performed.

Results

The results of Wilcoxon’s signed-ranks test to determine the effect of school sandplay group counselling on self-injury behavior and attachment of elementary school students are shown in <Table 2>.

Table 2. The scores on Validity scales and Clinical scales at pre- and post- treatment
Variable (N=22) Mean S.D t p Cohen’s d
Self Injury (FASM) pre 12.14 12.415 -3.823 .001** 0.422
post 7.41 9.267
Social Motivation pre 4.59 5.989 -1.533 .140 0.383
post 2.55 4.194
Intrinsic Motivation pre 3.09 3.702 -0.429 .672 0.078
post 2.82 3.111
Attachment (ecr-r) pre 136.55 23.034 -3.078 .006** 0.243
post 130.86 23.649
Anxious Attachment pre 66.23 18.16 -3.004 .007** 0.348
post 59.64 19.595
Avoidant Attatchment pre 70.32 13.21 0.389 .701 -0.067
post 71.23 13.69

p<.05,

p<.01

Download Excel Table

As a result of analyzing FASM, there was a significant difference from the pre-average score of 12.14 to the post-average score of 7.41 (t = -3.823, p = .001). No significant changes were observed in the social and intrinsic motivations of self-injury.

Attachment (ECR-R) showed a significant difference from the pre-average score of 136.55 to the post-average score of 130.86 (t = -3.078, p = .006), and anxious attachment showed a significant difference from the pre-average score of 40.88 to the post-average score of 29.25 (t = - 3.004, p = .007) showed a significant difference.

As a result of the analysis, self-injury behavior showed a medium effect size at (d=.422), attachment showed a small effect size at (d=.243), and anxious attachment showed a medium effect size at (d=.348).

In the case of self-injury, repeated measures ANOVA was performed on the difference in total self-injury score depending on the time point (pre, post), and a significant difference (p=0.001) was found. However, the interaction effect between time point and gender was not significant (p=o.057), and the results are shown in Table 3. In addition, when the difference in total attachment score according to the time point was tested using repeated measures ANOVA, a significant difference (p=0.007) was found. However, the interaction effect between time point and gender was not significant (p=0.209), and the results are shown in Table 4.

Table 3. Repeated Measures ANOVA of variance for gender differences in self-injury
source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
time 235.882 1 235.882 13.662 .0001
time* Gen 7.882 1 7.882 .457 .507
Error 345.300 20 17.265
Download Excel Table
Table 4. Repeated Measures ANOVA of variance for gender differences in attachment
source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
time 326.012 1 326.012 8.978 .007
time* Gen 61.103 1 61.103 1.683 .209
Error 726.283 20 36.314
Download Excel Table

Discussion

In this study, reports of self-injury behavior in the target group significantly decreased after Sandplay group counselling. This study is consistent with previous research (Ahn & Kwak, 2022) that reported clinically significant changes in the MMPI-2 symptom scale and symptoms of depression, anxiety, impulsivity, and aggression as a result of Sandplay group counselling with 22 adolescents who experienced suicidal incidents. .This study supports the results of a previous study that found a significant effect on depression, suicidal thoughts, and self-esteem, which affect self-injury, in a study including a control group targeting 5th and 6th grade elementary school students (Lee, 2023).

In addition, it is consistent with the results of the school Sandplay group counselling conducted for elementary school students with experience of self-injury, in which the frequency of self-injury and the internal motivation scale of the self-injury function significantly decreased (Jeon, Lee,& Ahn, 2023).

On the other hand, there is a study (Shin & Lee, 2021) that reported a decrease in depression and anxiety after conducting school Sandplay group counselling for eight elementary school students who reported self-injury behavior. However, unlike this study, the results of directly measuring changes in self-injury behavior were not reported.

In this study, it was confirmed that the level of anxious attachment of the target group was significantly lowered through school sandplay group counselling.

This study is consistent with a study that reported group Sandplay therapy had a significant effect on reducing anxiety and improving ego resilience in children (Yoo & Park, 2010), and a study that showed a significant effect on peer attachment in middle school students (Kim & Kim, 2015), and a study regarding a decrease in anxiety symptoms in elementary school students after school Sandplay group counselling (Kwak et al., 2018).

Attachment can improve adolescents’ emotional regulation and lead to the prevention of self-injury. When adolescents form a secure attachment with their mothers, their interactions with peers and others improve, and when communication skills improve, feelings of interpersonal alienation are reduced, which can contribute to reducing self-injury behavior (Gandhi et al., 2016).

The results of this study suggest that school Sandplay group counselling provides adolescents who report self-injury behavior with the opportunity to reveal their feelings and receive acceptance, which can lead to the formation of stable attachment and cessation of self-injury behavior.

Limitations of this study and future research directions are as follows.

First, there are limitations in generalizing the results as all participants in this study were obtained by selecting only 6th grade students from a specific region and a specific elementary school.

Second, because this study was conducted with a small number of samples, gender differences could not be examined. In a domestic school Sandplay group counselling study, impulsivity was found to decrease significantly more in women than in men (Lee, 2024). In other studies, women showed greater treatment effects on depression than men (Ahn, 2021). In future studies, it is necessary to examine whether there are significant differences by gender when Sandplay group counselling is conducted with elementary school students in the anxious attachment group who report self-injury behavior.

Third, depending on the attachment relationship formed by adolescents, it can be divided into father attachment, mother attachment, peer attachment, and teacher attachment. It is necessary to specifically explore changes in each attachment scale after school Sandplay group counselling.

Despite these limitations, considering that there are not many studies on the effectiveness of school Sandplay group counselling for elementary school students who report self-injury behavior, this study is significant meaning in light of confirming the results of improving attachment and reducing self-injury behavior in elementary school students.

References

1.

Ahn, U. K., Kwak, H. J., & Kim, Y. R. (2021). Research Trends in Korean Journal of Sandplay Group Therapy. School Counselling and Sandplay, 3(2), 66-84.

2.

An, U. K. (2021). Clinical Effect of School Sand Play as a Group Therapy on Adolescents’ Emotions and Behaviors (Doctoral dissertation). Dankook University, Cheonansi, Korea. http://lib.dankook.ac.kr/dcollection/common/orgView/000000197124

3.

An, U. K., & Kwak, H. J. (2022). Clinical Effect of SPT in Adolescents Experiencing Suicidal Events. School Counselling and Sandplay, 4(1), 25-44.

4.

Ainsworth, M. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American psychologist, 44(4), 709. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&SEARCH=00000487-198904000-00042.an

5.

Allan, J., & Berry, P. (1987). Sandplay. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling, 21(4), 300-306. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42871246

6.

Anestis, M. D., Pennings, S. M., Lavender, J. M., Tull, M. T., & Gratz, K. L. (2013). Low distress tolerance as an indirect risk factor for suicidal behavior: Considering the explanatory role of non-suicidal self-injury. Comprehensive psychiatry, 54(7), 996-1002.

7.

Banwarth, S. I. (2007). Sandplay with children in the school setting. University of Northern Iowa, Graduate Research Papers. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/grp/304/

8.

Bowlby, J.(1969). Attachment. New York: Basic Books.

9.

Carmichael, K. D. (1994). Sand play as an elementary school strategy. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling, 28(4), 302-307. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42871132

10.

Chapman, A. L., Gratz, K. L., & Brown, M. Z. (2006). Solving the puzzle of deliberate self-harm: The experiential avoidance model. Behaviour research and therapy, 44(3), 371-394.

11.

Claes, L., De Raedt, R., Van de Walle, M., & Bosmans, G. (2016). Attentional bias moderates the link between attachment-related expectations and non-suicidal self-injury. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 40, 540-548.

12.

Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58(4), 644-663.

13.

Cooper, M. L., Shaver, P. R., & Collins, N. L. (1998). Attachment styles, emotion regulation, and adjustment in adolescence. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(5), 1380-1397.

14.

Freedle, L. R. (2007). Sandplay therapy with traumatic brain injured adults: An exploratory qualitative study. Journal of Sandplay Therapy. 16(2), 115–133. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-13037-013

15.

Gandhi, A., Claes, L., Bosmans, G., Baetens, I., Wilderjans, T. F., Maitra, S., ... & Luyckx, K. (2016). Non-suicidal self-injury and adolescents attachment with peers and mother: The mediating role of identity synthesis and confusion. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(6), 1735-1745.

16.

Goss, S., & Campbell, M. A. (2004). The value of sandplay as a therapeutic tool for school guidance counsellors. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 14(2), 211-220.

17.

Green, E. J., Myrick, A. C., & Crenshaw, D. A. (2013). Toward secure attachment in adolescent relational development: Advancements from sandplay and expressive play-based interventions. International Journal of Play Therapy, 22(2), 90.

18.

Guan, K., Fox, K. R., & Prinstein, M. J. (2012). Nonsuicidal self-injury as a time-invariant predictor of adolescent suicide ideation and attempts in a diverse community sample. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 80(5), 842. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2012-20362-001

19.

Guertin, T., Lloyd-Richardson, E., Spirito, A., Donaldson, D., & Boergers, J. (2001). Self-mutilative behavior in adolescents who attempt suicide by overdose. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(9), 1062-1069.

20.

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological inquiry, 5(1), 1-22.

21.

Herpertz, S., Sass, H., & Favazza, A. (1997). Impulsivity in self-mutilative behavior: Psychometric and biological findings. Journal of psychiatric research, 31(4), 451-465.

22.

Hong, M. A., & Park, S. M. (2022). The mediating effect of self-esteem and distress tolerance on the relationship between parents attachment and non-suicidal self-injury among adolescents. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 29(4), 327-355.

23.

Hooley, J. M., & St. Germain, S. A. (2014). Nonsuicidal self-injury, pain, and self-criticism: Does changing self-worth change pain endurance in people who engage in self-injury?. Clinical Psychological Science, 2(3), 297-305.

24.

Jeon, M. J., Lee, H. K., & Kwak, H. J. (2022). Effect of School Sand Play Group Counse ling on Emotional and Behavioral Problems, Peer Problems, and Aggression of Elementary School Students. School Counselling and Sandplay, 4(1), 1-10.

25.

Jeon, M. J., Lee, H. K., & An, U. K. (2023). The effect of school sand play group counseling on self-concept, self-injury function, and suicide ideation in elementary school students with experience of self-injury: A preliminary study. School Counselling and Sandplay, 5(2), 34-43.

26.

Jung, J. S., Park, W. R., & Hong, S. H. (2023). Analysis of variables related to non-suicidal self-injury in the upper grades of elementary school. The Korean Journal of Elementary Counseling, 22(4), 345-371.

27.

Kalff, D. M. (2003). Sandplay: A psychotherapeutic approach to the psyche. Temenos Press. https://www.amazon.com/Sandplay-Psychotherapeutic-Approach-Psyche-Classics/dp/0972851704

28.

Kim, D. J., Kim, S. J., & Ahn, U. K. (2023). Sensory Processing Abilities in Elementary Students with Suicide Ideation: A Preliminary Study on the Clinical Effects of School Sandplay Group Counseling. School Counselling and Sandplay, 5(3), 44-63.

29.

Kim, M. J., Kwon, K. I. (2014). The Relation of Adolescent Parental Attachment, Separation-Individuation, Ego-Resilience and Peer Attachment. The Korea Journal of Youth Counseling, 22(2), 1-23

30.

Kim, S.-Y., Park, S.-W., Kim, S.-H., & Lee, D.-H. (2022). Relationship between Loneliness and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Severity:Moderating Effect of Media and Interpersonal Exposure to Self-Injury. Korean Journal of Counseling, 23(3), 173-197.

31.

Kim, S. H. (2004). Adaptation of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised Scale into Korean: Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory approaches (Master’s thesis). Seoul National University, Korea.

32.

Kim, J. Y., Kim, S.-Y., & Lee, D. H. (2020). Risk Factors for Continuation of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: A Comparative Study of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Characteristics and an Integrated Theoretical Model. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 32(3), 1095-1124.

33.

Kim, H. R., & Kim, Y. J. (2015). The Effects of Group Sandplay Therapy on Peer Attachment, Impulsiveness, and Social Anxiety of Adolescents Addicted to Smart Phones. Journal of Symbols & Sandplay Therapy, 6(2). 1-12. https://www.sandplay.or.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=dataroom&wr_id=161&sfl=wr_subject&stx=%EC%8A%A4%EB%A7%88%ED%8A%B8%ED%8F%B0&sop=and

34.

Kim, S. J. (2019). The Effects of Adolescents’ Impulsiveness on Self-Injury: Moderating Effects of Social Support. Journal of Future Social Work Research, 10(1), 273-298.

35.

Klonsky, E. D., & Olino, T. M. (2008). Identifying clinically distinct subgroups of self-injurers among young adults: a latent class analysis. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 76(1), 22. https://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~klonsky/publications/latent_2008.pdf

36.

Kobak, R. R., & Sceery, A. (1988). Attachment in late adolescence: Working models, affect regulation, and representations of self and others. Child development, 135-146.

37.

Kwak, H. J., Ahn, U. K., & Lim, M. H. (2020). The clinical effects of school sandplay group therapy on general children with a focus on Korea Child & Youth Personality Test. BMC psychology, 8, 1-6.

38.

Kwak, H. J., An, U. K., Han, K. J., & Lim, M. H. (2018). The clinical effect of school sand play group counseling on child emotion and behavior. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 18(12), 54-61.

39.

Kwon, H. J. (2014). Exploration of emotional and cognitive factors influencing non-suicidal self-injury (Master’s thesis). Seoul National University, Korea.

40.

Lee, J. H., Choi, S. M., & Yoo, I. H. (2021). The Relationship between Insecure Attachment Style and Behavior Contagion in Adolescents: The Mediating Effect of Self-Acceptance and Peer Conformity. Korean journal of youth studies, 28(5), 115-139.

41.

Lee, J., Kim, G. M., Jang, O., Park, B., Kim, H., Hyeon, G., ... & LEE, J. J. (2023). Development and effectiveness of non-suicidal self-injury prevention program for adolescents using brief dialectical behavioral therapy skills training (DBT-ST). Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 62(3), 102-110.

42.

Lee, J. J. (2017). A structural relationship between school-aged children’s anger-control and its related variables (Doctoral dissertation). Daegu Catholic University, Korea. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14585176

43.

Lee, K. S., Suh, S. J., & Shin, Y. J. (2000). Influence of attachment relationship with parents on rejection sensitivity and peer relation in school-age children. Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 11(1), 51-59. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO200036036137495.pdf

44.

Lee, M. B., & Kim, E. J. (2020). The effects of school sandplay group counselling on emotional and behavioral problems in the lower grades of elementary school. School Counselling and Sandplay, 2(1), 1-13.

45.

Lee, M. B. (2023). A study on the effects of school sandplay group therapy on children victims of cyberbullying - Focusing on depression, suicidal ideation, and self-esteem (Doctoral dissertation). Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea. https://lib.dankook.ac.kr/dcollection/public_resource/pdf/000000199066_20240801132756.pdf

46.

Lee, S. H. (2024). Clinical effects of school sandplay group therapy on depression, anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity, impulsivity, and self-esteem in adolescents with delinquent behavior (Doctoral dissertation). Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea. https://lib.dankook.ac.kr/dcollection/public_resource/pdf/000000199852_20240801132929.pdf

47.

M. Miyuki., (2017). 自閉症スペクトラムのイメージ表現の変容 ランドマークの出現と 「私」 の生成. 箱庭療法学研究, 30(1), 17-29.

48.

Muris, P., Mayer, B., & Meesters, C. (2000). Self-reported attachment style, anxiety, and depression in children. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 28(2), 157-162.

49.

Muris, P., Meesters, C., Morren, M., & Moorman, L. (2004). Anger and hostility in adolescents: Relationships with self-reported attachment style and perceived parental rearing styles. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57(3), 257-264.

50.

Nock, M. K., & Kessler, R. C. (2006). Prevalence of and risk factors for suicide attempts versus suicide gestures: Analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(3), 616-623. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=46fb10a0747e968d91f252b5c32b2e8397ede0cb

51.

Nock, M. K., & Prinstein, M. J. (2004). A functional approach to the assessment of self-mutilative behavior. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 72(5), 885-890. https://nocklab.fas.harvard.edu/files/nocklab/files/nock_2004_funcapp_assessment_self-mutilativebeh_jccp.pdf

52.

Nock, M. K., & Prinstein, M. J. (2005). Contextual features and behavioral functions of self-mutilation among adolescents. Journal of abnormal psychology, 114(1), 140-146.

53.

Nock, M. K., Prinstein, M. J., & Sterba, S. K. (2009). Revealing the form and function of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: A real-time ecological assessment study among adolescents and young adults. Journal of abnormal psychology, 118(4), 816-827.

54.

Park, J. S. (2008). The effect of adolescents’ psychological adjustment according to attachment style on attitudes towards seeking professional help (Doctoral dissertation) Kyungsung University. Korea. https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11207096

55.

Park, J. E., & Lee, E. H. (2008). Adolescents’ Insecure Attachments and Problem Behaviors: The Moderating Role of Empathic Ability. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 20(2), 369-389. https://accesson.kr/kcpa/v.20/2/369/20489

56.

Roesler, C. (2019). Sandplay therapy: An overview of theory, applications and evidence base. The arts in Psychotherapy, 64, 84-94.

57.

Shin, H. J., & Lee, M. B. (2021). The Effects of School Sand Play Group Counseling on Depression and Anxiety of Elementary School Students : A Preliminary Study. School Counselling and Sandplay, 3(1), 16-26.

58.

Shin, J. H., & Kim, S. S. (2021). The Effect of Senior Elementary School Students’ Emotional Perception Clarity, Emotion Regulation, and Family Relationship on Non-Suicidal Self-Injury and Depression. Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing, 32(4), 457-466.

59.

Sroufe, L. A. (2005). Attachment and development: A prospective, longitudinal study from birth to adulthood. Attachment & human development, 7(4), 349-367.

60.

Tatnell, R., Kelada, L., Hasking, P., & Martin, G. (2014). Longitudinal analysis of adolescent NSSI: The role of intrapersonal and interpersonal factors. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 42, 885-896.